I would
like to terminate my relationship with my psychotherapist of three years.
I haven’t been to see him in three months; it was always our arrangement
that I would see him when I wanted and there were never regularly scheduled
visits.
Our relationship was a “very intense transference relationship”
as he put it but suddenly I just feel OK without him (no fondness, no attachment,
no anger). I’m wondering if I should give him the courtesy of telling
him or if I should just leave things be. That way I wouldn’t be burning
my bridge in the event that I may require his help further on down the road.
I also wonder if the transference is really over. How does one
know?
Usually, psychotherapy is structured around regularly scheduled
visits, most often once per week. Consequently, it’s only in this context of
regular visits that
termination has
any meaning, because it’s the regularity of the visits that is being terminated.
Your treatment, however, has been conducted on an as-needed
basis, and so there really is nothing to terminate. All you really need to do is
change your as-needed time frame; even “never again” still fits the
definition of “as needed.”
An “intense
transference
relationship” is a polite way of describing extreme vacillations between
love and hate.
It signifies that a person depends primarily on the
“Other”—that is, external recognition—to maintain a sense
of “self.” When the recognition is positive, then you’re
intoxicated and you feel loved. When the recognition is negative, then your
whole sense of being collapses through
terror into a pit
of anger and
vengeance.
Now, if and when
you achieve such inner stability as to not require external validation from
others to feel worthwhile, and when you can give real love to others even
when you feel unloved—and even hated—by them, then all transference
is over.
I caution
you, however, that when you feel anything “suddenly” there is often
an unconscious cause
lurking in the background. In your case, the desire to terminate a relationship
that doesn’t need to be terminated could be a veiled desire for
revenge—and that would mean the transference, far from being over, is
really alive and thriving.
No
advertising—no sponsor—just the simple truth . . .
|
|
|
|